You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘women’ tag.
The other day, a co-worker came running towards me shouting that she is about to become a grandmother for the first time. Needless to say, I was excited for her . . . that is . . . until she went on to say that she was glad that the baby would be going home with the girl and the girl’s mother since her son and the girl are not married.
That’s when I exploded.
I mean, aren’t we women first, and the mothers of sons second? When did we lose our empathy for the women that we supposedly were teaching our sons to love and cherish? When did we forget the treatment that we received at the hands of no account men and condone, if not outright encourage, that same behavior in our sons towards young women? How did it happen? When did it happen? How/when did we become so uninterested, so uncaring, so maliciously unconcerned with regard to the girls that our sons mess over (during their learning/experimental phase) while simultaneously nursing our own bad relationship and abandonment wounds?
I confess… I am sorely disappointed by my sisters. Not all of them, of course. My disappointment lies solely on the women who have sons (not daughters) and allow their young “men” to devastate the lives of other females without repercussion. This is particularly sad given the fact that more than a few of these same women are single parents themselves. Whether abandoned, despised or just plain ignored, they have found themselves in the same position that various young women have been left in by their trifling sons. These same women raise sons but somehow don’t get the message across to them that it isn’t okay to engage in casual sex with females, make a baby and then go on their merry way, leaving the mother of the child sidelined.
I know, I know, it is important that we make our daughters understand that it is they who are taking the majority of the risk during intercourse (most often, not even good intercourse but, that’s another blog). Men can participate during the pregnancy; the rearing of the child; and the financial, spiritual, emotional, psychological and educational development of the child if they “choose” to. Women, on the other hand, don’t have that same level of choice/flexibility.
This is not to say that women are saintly, innocent and/or don’t make mistakes. Neither do I mean to imply that women are always good parents or bereft of responsibility when it comes to sex. On the contrary, I mean to emphasize that women are the ones who end up pregnant, not men, so any decision she makes (be it to give birth, to give the baby up for adoption or to abort) will have a lifetime effect on her that it will not have on the man.
In this generation where females have more birth control options at their disposal than ever, there is really no excuse. Yet, women continue to play Russian Roulette with their lives. They continue to take unnecessary risk with their futures by depending on and believing in a male (yes, I said male, not man) who makes a lot of pre-sex promises but will fail to deliver. So, perhaps, the mothers of sons can take a different approach. Perhaps, our sons can benefit from being forewarned that the reality of their momentary need for pleasure is the merging of two families, FOREVER. I mean, is just any girl worthy of carrying on your family lineage? Or maybe mothers can teach their sons that the bitterness they feel over the absence of their own father is the same as the child feels for their absence. Is your absence somehow more reasonable and right than that of your own father? Can anybody hear me?