You are currently browsing the category archive for the ‘Politicos’ category.

For some odd reason that I was never 100% clear on, homophobia is defined as a dislike of and/or prejudice toward homosexual people.

I always wondered how that could be, when “homo” simply means human being/man or same (depending on your root language) while “phobia” is indicative of an unnatural fear of or aversion to something.

So, how exactly do these two words, “homo” and “phobia,” when merged together become a dislike of and/or an unnatural fear of homosexuals?

Where’s the fear?   Do people think that homosexuals are stalking around every corner, just waiting to ambush them on the street and shower them in their homosexuality?

Is that a thing?

It would seem to me that someone who is homophobic would have to, by extension, possess an overall fear of or dislike of people, heterosexual and/or heterosexual alike.  After all, since you can’t readily tell who is gay and who isn’t, the supposed homophobic would be living in a state of constant paranoia and worry.

While I readily admit that I am from the school of thought that men should be with women and that women should be with men exclusively, I don’t understand how that fact means that I dislike and/or am afraid of homosexuals?

What a quantum leap!

Just like how I admit my own thoughts on the matter, I readily accept the fact that others disagree with my position on homosexuality and, as such, live their lives to that end.

Likewise, I also readily accept that there are many who are not homosexual, but who approve of and support others in the lifestyle.

What I don’t get is how approval of the lifestyle is just that—approval—while disapproval of the lifestyle is a dislike and/or fear of homosexuals.  Shouldn’t that be classified as homophilia or something similar?

Must I change my personal feelings on homosexuality itself so as not to be labeled a hater of people?

Why am I only free to approve of homosexuality but not free to disapprove of a homosexual lifestyle without being labeled?

On the flipside, is there a label for homosexuals who believe that homosexuality is preferable to heterosexuality?

Would that automatically mean that they hate and/or are unnaturally afraid of heterosexuals?

That would be utterly ridiculous, right?  So, why isn’t it just as ridiculous in the reverse?

And, what about supporters of homosexuals who are heterosexuals?  Is there a label for them?

Be it known that I disapprove of the homosexual lifestyle. However, be it also known that I don’t dislike nor am I afraid of homosexuals.  So why is there a label for me?  And why is that label homophobic?

This is going to sound cliché, but it’s true.  I have met, worked with and have relatives that fall somewhere along the LGBTQ spectrum.  However, I can say with certainty that I have never met a homosexual individual that I was any more afraid of than a heterosexual individual.  Should I be?

Truth be told, I’ve probably met more than a few heterosexuals who have given me pause.  Is there a word for that?

Can anyone hear me?

Advertisements

OK, I just turned on my television and after flipping just a few channels, I stumble onto yet another Trump-filled circus act.

With arms flailing and discombobulated speech, he performs as if in a stage play…not a very good play mind you, but a stage play nonetheless.

I watch him deliberately distort information and play mostly to ignorant, poor whites who he has somehow managed to convince that they mean something to him!

It truly is something to see!

I mean, you would think that it would be a little more difficult to convince poor white people that a wealthy man (black or white) who has never been poor a day in his life is somehow one of them, but Trump has managed to get this done this without incident.

So how is he able do it so effortlessly?  How is he able to do this at all?

Let’s see the overall process.  When you break it down, it really isn’t all that different from what’s been done historically.

For this to work, all the wealthy white person in question, in this case Trump, has to do is convince poor whites that blacks are their true enemy.  They accomplish this by telling poor white that blacks, who are every bit as poor as them, are the ones taking everything from them, not wealthy whites.  They keep the focus on the hundred or so blacks who are doing well and off of the millions that are not.  Then, they highlight any who are poor but not walking around in burlap sacks with no teeth and convince everyone that this person having basic hygiene is somehow evidence of them gaming the system and taking money away from those “who really need it.”  This method insures that poor whites will constantly fight with blacks instead of demanding their share of the American pie.  In fact, with this method, most poor white people won’t even notice that they are barely getting pie crust.

It’s an effective, if completely shameless and inhuman strategy.  But why do it?

Simply stated, he has to!  Like every President before him, Trump has to convince us (poor whites and poor blacks) that America is about Democrats vs. Republicans, rather than about Haves vs. Have Nots.  This very delicate, but necessary balance is critical to the haves in both parties maintaining their status and control and is achieved in two steps.

When applied properly, success is guaranteed whether Democratic or Republican.

In step 1, poor whites are made to feel superior to blacks.

In step 2, a well-placed agitating media story will insure a battle between the two, any time.

These steps are mandatory for keeping poor whites from figuring out that Democrats/Republicans don’t care about them any more than they care about blacks.

Now, this information comes as no surprise to most black people who already know that they are disrespected and mistreated. However, poor white people actually believe that they are part of the Democratic and Republican system in American.  So, they have to be constantly manipulated/stimulated to keep them under the spell.

The hardest part of the entire exercise is keeping poor white America from figuring out that they have zero stake in wealthy white American life.  In fact, they must never discover that Democrats and Republicans are actually on the same team!  Further, they must never ascertain that Democrats and Republicans only feign heated arguments to entertain us.

Think about it!

What would happen to wealthy 1% of whites if poor whites and blacks ever come together and converge on them?

They are severely outnumbered… so much so that keeping this system running as-is regardless of which one takes Office is job one.  This is the true oath of Office.

They alternate every so often to make the masses believe that some form of progress is being made even though the evidence of that progress remains elusive to those who need it the most! And despite it being so obvious, it still works because “if you can convince the lowest white man that he is above the highest black man, he’ll never notice you’re picking his pocket.”

Can anybody hear me?

I recently heard a newscast where psychologists and other so-called experts went on record as saying that spankings make children violent and can be responsible for violent behavior later in their adult years.  Ultimately, they concluded that children should never be spanked.

I must admit that those experts and their associated statements made me very, very angry.  Why you might ask?

Generations of Blacks (men, women and children of all ages) experienced whippings/beatings/battering and other abuse during slavery at the hands of White slave masters!  Even years afterwards, with the formation of terrorist groups like the Klan and the actions of various Night Riders (to say nothing of the legally sanctioned actions of various police agencies and forces), Black people from cradle to grave were beaten, brutalized and subjected to emotional and psychological trauma for well over a century.  Throughout all this time, where were the psychological analyses from the so-called experts of that time, or even today, stating that enslaving Black people and subsequently beating them viciously well into their advanced years would result in them becoming hostile, with possible violent implications for future generations?

Post-slavery, Blacks adopted many of the same violent practices that they learned and experienced first-hand during slavery when raising their own children, both due to their own traumatic experiences and as a defense mechanism.  Fear for their children’s very lives prompted many Black parents to beat their children incessantly so that they would not be killed by Whites who perceived them as not knowing their place in society.

Again, where were/are the psychological analyses affirming that Blacks experiencing extreme violence and trauma during and after slavery might negatively affect every area of Black life in present and future generations?

I mean, there have been plenty of studies and questionable reports regarding violence in the Black community and/or depicting blacks as somehow more prone to violence than other races of people as an inherent result of their blackness.  Yet, not one psychological analysis attributes any part of this violent behavior to the known violence experienced by Blacks during and post slavery.

Where are the multi-paged psychological reports that explain in horrific detail that slavery and the vestiges thereof cannot be ignored as a causative factor of violence within the black community?

How can this be?  If psychologists can attribute violence in adults to spankings as children then why not attribute the brutal beatings during slavery as a factor in Blacks being violent afterwards?

Is my conclusion really so farfetched?

These same so-called experts want parents to be responsible for creating violent children (and later adults) by spanking them, but don’t assign this same level of blame and responsibility to white America for damaging and creating violent Black children that later become violent Black adults!

Either spankings cause violence in children—all children regardless of race—resulting in violent adults or they don’t. You simply can’t have it as a rule for one group or one demographic and not the other that is…unless, of course, we’re dealing with unequal standards or some form of associated, culturally spread schizophrenia?

But that’s another blog for another day!

Can anybody hear me?

In the News last week:  Jussie Smollett

In the News this week:  Jussie Smollett.

In the News next week (you’ll never guess):  Jussie Smollett.

In fact, week after week after week after week:  The Misadventures of Jussie Smollett is THE news…to my utter dismay.

What can I say?!  I am so tired of hearing about Jussie Smollett, his arrest, his hoax, his release, his existence and anything else to do with him at this point.  In fact, hearing his name makes me sigh involuntarily.

Don’t get me wrong; it’s not that I am not a fan or that I am a fan or that I have ever been or not been a fan.  Truth is, I’ve not seen one episode of Empire…and have no plans to change that anytime soon.  Thus, I have no particular attachment, emotion or loyalty to him, the show or to his character.  For me, the problem is simple…the overkill.  Enough already!

From the outset of this ‘made for TV’ spectacle, it was clear that whatever had taken place (or had not taken place as the case seems to be) would be played out in the media and not in a courtroom.

Remember courtrooms?

You may have heard of them.  They are places where potentially criminal cases are tried in front of a judge and jury, with one side mounting a defense and the other prosecuting.  I hear they’re really big overseas.  And, at one point, they used to be big here too…before they were replaced by a jury of social media.

At this point, I would be remiss if I didn’t mention the Nigerian brothers (somehow easily confused with white attackers) who were supposedly hired by him to commit the alleged “crime.”   Now, they would have us believe that the “brothers” had been hired by Smollett himself and paid via check (of all payment methods available today).  Seriously?  A check?

I’m surprised they didn’t try to convince people the “memo” section of the check stated “Payment for media hoax.”  I mean, why not?

Who on Earth would pay for any such services with a check in 2019?  Could anyone possibly be that stupid in this age of CSI (and the like)?  Why are we even considering this foolishness?

Wait a minute…

With that last question, I’m left with an even more horrific thought.  While the country was being entertained by this and other tomfoolery, what other, way more important things were taking place behind the scenes?

What programs were being cut, what leaders were being ousted, what ordinary citizens were starving, homeless, jobless, being killed, etc. while we were ODing on foolishness?

Frankly, this felt a little too much like a daytime soap opera being presented as something actually newsworthy.  To be honest, I’m tired of entertainment being called news.  Let’s face it, Jussie Smollett’s case is not new or news!  In fact, it is quite typical.  Imagine a black man being targeted, mistreated or beaten by racist whites in America?  Now imagine that case being ruled unsolvable or some kind of figment? I mean, is any of that really farfetched?

Regardless of that, shouldn’t news provide useful information about current events that will affect the viewer…instead of gossip, innuendo and/or propaganda aimed at keeping us entertained rather than informed?

Shouldn’t major issues of politics and international relations and trade be always be pushed to the forefront of people’s minds?

Shouldn’t I be able to turn on the television or go online and immediately find out what I need to know about the world around me?

Who is dating whom in Hollywood or some Dynasty level drama isn’t exactly what I had in mind.  How about you?

Has anybody else had enough of this madness?

Can anybody hear me?

Has anyone else noticed that the negative behaviors of a few black people determine how the entire race of black people is globally perceived yet the same is not true for other races of people?

In other words, why aren’t all other races judged according to the lowest members of their race?  Why is that reserved for black people…and why does it happen at all?

Why aren’t white people in America defined by Charles Manson, Ted Bundy, Timothy McVeigh and a host of others too numerous to write about?

Why do they get to brush their bad individuals (both past and present) aside and keep positive members of the white race at the forefront while blacks are forced to carry current and historical bad members of the black race on their backs…even if their alleged crimes/actions pale by comparison to those actually committed by whites?

Why are blacks tasked to “live down” the embarrassment and shame associated with being members of the same race of any notorious black person whether directly related or not while whites are allowed to disassociate and, even worse, harshly judge other races of people as if they are somehow above reproach?

Why do black people have to constantly prove that they, individually, are one of the “good ones” and qualified, talented, moral and trustworthy enough, while other races, white people in particular, are just assumed to be so?

On the flipside, how come white people don’t feel confined/stigmatized/represented by the same or worse behaviors of members of their own race?

Where is the overall embarrassment by white people for people like BTK, Jeffrey Dahmer, the KKK etc., being members of the white race?

Meanwhile, Blacks are made to feel bad about organizing/listening to groups/individuals like the Black Panthers, Louis Farrakhan and Al Sharpton…even though they have never killed anyone?

Why, if this is a truly a nation of opportunity and innovation, do negative black people such as the DC Sniper got plenty of media time while black inventors, educators, etc., remain (if you’ll pardon the pun) hidden figures?

Why is this?

To keep this line of questioning going, why is it that if blacks like OJ Simpson are found not guilty in the penal justice system, they are still supposed to behave as if they are guilty so as not to offend white people because…or else find themselves subject to judicial manipulation/rule changes that impact their freedom regardless of the verdict?

Why are so many white people, like the Affluenza teen, who are actually found guilty of actual crimes allowed to be arrogant in their criminality?

Why are white people like Dylan Roof and others like him allowed to hide behind mental illness as an excuse for their actual guilt/racist/white supremacist behavior while blacks who commit lesser crimes are labeled as demonic and extended no sympathy?

Why is that?

While we’re at it, why are blacks supposed to be harder on each other than whites are on their own?

For example, why are blacks supposed to abandon Cosby who is 82 years old and in prison, yet, whites aren’t expected to do the same with Weinstein?  Hefner?  Clinton?  Trump?

Are these white men a credit to their race any more than Cosby is to the black race?

Why is there a surge in incidents of white people calling the police on black people for performing everyday tasks like walking around, buying coffee, etc. and no surge of outrage from supposedly God-fearing, morally upstanding whites?

Why is there no outrage from those who claim to be pro-life and love people following the random shooting of unarmed blacks ranging from 12 years of age to senior status by law enforcement?

Where’s the white outrage?

Remember Sandra Bland?

Where’s the white feminist outrage?

Yet, white America would have us to believe that this is post racial America and that blacks can actually be racist?

Why would we ever believe that foolishness?

Can anybody hear me?

Was it just me or was there just not enough public outrage over the shutdown—partial or otherwise—of the federal government?

I mean, I saw people crying about their conditions, begging for the government to reopen and, in some of the most saddening cases, tearfully accepting assistance from food banks or charities just to make it.  But, even in the face of uncertainty and humiliation, overall, people were just a little too reserved.

Now I’m not advocating violence or anything crazy like that but, what better time to at least speak truth to power than the shutdown…a shutdown that was punctuated by a President of the United States so out of touch with poverty, not to mention reality, that he suggested that those affected by the shutdown simply explain their situation to their local supermarket managers to receive assistance (when simply being escorted from the premises is the much more likely scenario)?

If that were not enough, to add further insult to injury, it was actually suggested at one point that those affected take out loans.

How many more shots can anyone be expected to take?

I mean, what else did they have to lose?

House, car, food, utilities, kids in college depending on parental assistance, etc., were already jeopardized.

Why not speak up?  Why not yell from the rooftops?

Of interest to me is that Trump remained relatively popular and supported even after a devastating 30+ days of government shutdown (which, by the way, affected everyone and not just government workers).

I mean, I wasn’t expecting torches and pitchforks, but I was at least expecting some kind of mass mutiny from Trump’s poor white base.  Instead, they didn’t seem to mind suffering just as long as poor blacks were suffering too (to say nothing of getting that wall to keep all those nasty, brown people out).  And just forget about Trump’s campaign promise that Mexico would pay for the Wall!  His base totally put that aside without further ado.

It made me wonder how this could be.  But, more than that, it brought back to my mind the question of how a rich white man could have ever been chosen by poor whites to represent them in the first place?  How did they convince themselves that he could…much less, would?

Then it dawned on me.

I asked myself, who benefits the most from poor whites blaming/fighting and protesting against poor blacks and Hispanics as if they are directly or indirectly responsible for their impoverished state of being?

The answer?

How about the wealthy white one percent who benefit by getting the impoverished majority to battle each other while never focusing on them?

Think about it!  What would happen to them if all the underrepresented groups ever joined forces?

Maybe that mass mutiny I spoke of earlier…complete with torches and pitchforks?

Can anybody hear me?

Ok, let’s try this again.

Say it with me:  Black people cannot be racist.

That’s because racism is an all encompassing, global, socio-political system put in place with the intent to elevate the white races of people on the planet while simultaneously destroying the dark races of people on the planet.

You would think this would be a simple thing to grasp but, for some reason, it isn’t.  So, I’ve put together a cheat sheet to help clarify this subject.  I call it racism (white supremacy) for dummies)!

In a nutshell, black people can be racially biased.  This is akin to choosing a blue shirt over a red shirt to wear on any given day.  Even though the blue shirt was preferred, it is important to note that the red shirt was not harmed in any way, shape or form by this preference.

Conversely, with racism (white supremacy), the blue shirt is also preferred, however the red shirt is presented as inferior to the blue shirt by virtue of being red.  The red shirt is unfairly targeted, criticized and damaged using media, radio, books, etc.  The red shirt is not valued or maintained and does receive the care or opportunities allotted to the blue shirt.  In fact, the red shirt is slashed, torn, used as a dust rag, a dish cloth etc., while the blue shirt is treasured, treated kindly, represented in every arena as superior in quality. The result is the deliberate and calculated destruction of the red shirt.

Racism is not simply a negative comment from Rosanne, Meghan Kelly, the manager at Starbucks, etc.  These singular acts of racial superiority, while ugly, are being exploited in order to present racism as an individual or isolated act that can be committed by anyone, even black people.

This is grossly inaccurate and intended to deceive not only white people but blacks as well.

Again, racism requires the financial ability to institute and maintain socio-political systems in place that not only elevate your race but also strategically destroy another race of people in the process.

So you see, there is no real threat of black people being racist (in the reverse or otherwise).  That’s because racism (white supremacy) is a system (not an individual) that affects politics (voting), labor, employment/educational opportunities, fair housing/loans/credit (mortgage/car purchases), religious affiliations, everyday lifestyle (clothing/hairstyle and care choices) and entertainment.

Racism renders all other systems as moot because the laws/statues/rules of society, being created by racists, will inevitably caters to racists, such that even black elected/selected officials have no choice but to carry them out even to the continued peril of their own people.

And, history is filled with the tragic stories of those who have run afoul this well established system.

Can anybody hear me?

Even though the United States of America was built on and runs on racism/white supremacy as well as Dunkin, it is my belief that even the most committed racist and the most celebrated liberal can agree on one thing: that America was a better America before a Trump presidency.

To be fair to Donald Trump, he most certainly didn’t create or institute racism/white supremacy in America.  He didn’t even introduce the concepts into politics, in particular.

I think the under representation of blacks on SCOTUS, as POTUS and in every area of Government speaks for itself, to say nothing of their uneven treatment under established law.

But, even though racism/white supremacy is as American as apple pie, once upon a time, there existed such things as diplomacy, protocol and decorum.

Today, those things no longer exist.

Because of Trump’s unpresidential, unprofessional leadership and his inability to express himself on an adult level, it is now okay for everyone, regardless of age, rank or position of authority, to speak to each other and to the general public in any manner that they choose.  From the highly educated and intellectual to the utterly base and crass, it’s fair to say that today, anything goes!

And the more profane, the better. Sadly, the lower the comments and standards, the better the chance of winning the sought-after office.

And this is why a Trump presidency was a bad idea.  It’s not because he invented, rehashed or can even remotely eradicate or minimize racism/white supremacy or any of its associated ills.  He didn’t and he can’t.

It’s not even that he is any more racist/white supremacist than any other president.  In fact, if we’re honest, we will admit that racism/white supremacy never ended (or even waned) and, that it was especially egregious during the Obama administration.

No, it is solely because Trump ushered in poor manners, as well as rude, crude and socially unacceptable behavior.  He not only made these things popular, he made them IN in a way they never should have been.  This is why I take issue with him.

Television was already dominated by images and streams of fools parading their poor behavior and life choices around and being rewarded for it (and, in many cases, emulated).  But some areas, most notably politics, were at least free of that stain.  That is not the case anymore.

To put it simply, Trump made an already bad situation worse.  He made lowlife behavior not only acceptable in the low sphere, but fashionable in the higher areas!

Gone are the days that people actually gave thought to what they were going to say before they spoke.  Now, whatever comes to people’s mouths comes out before even making a pit stop at the brain.  Now, something as simple and straightforward as objective reality must bend to classlessness, lies and slander disguised as alternative points of view.

We can all agree that this should not be.  Can anybody hear me?

If you’re like me, you hate to see anyone being mistreated.  If you’re REALLY like me, you hate to see almost ANY living creature (with a special minus on a select few) being mistreated as well.

As such, I am as upset over the recent immigration scandal as anyone else.  However, what really makes me upset is when people become selectively distraught by the sufferings of some while willfully ignoring the sufferings of others.

What do I mean?

It is of a truth that Jewish communities are allowed and even encouraged to remember the misdeeds of one Adolf Hitler.  According to history, he targeted them for destruction over a period of approximately 5 years.  We can safely assume that he is hated by all Jewish persons and, furthermore, that others are taught to revile him as well.

To that end, the Holocaust is taught in detail at every learning institution; at least one film is produced every year recounting their mistreatment; and (and this is the best part) even though they have recovered (quite handsomely, I might add) in the form of a homeland (Israel) and the amassing of extreme wealth, and social and political influence, Hitler remains atop history’s most hated villains list.

Conversely, African Americans, who were kidnapped from their homeland, enslaved in a foreign land, raped, murdered, pillaged, bred like animals and violated in every aspect of their lives, are directed to do the opposite of what Jewish persons are allowed (and even instructed) to do.  Instead of being encouraged to remember (even though it’s impossible to forget an ongoing saga) their historical mistreatment at the hands of an entire race of people (not just one man), African Americans are instructed not to relive their obvious and no less disturbing suffering.  And they are admonished for doing otherwise.

In fact, African Americans, unlike any other group, have to feign adjustment and affection for a hostile political and social system or risk being accused of being hate-filled, unable to move on from the past, and/or of using their history as slaves as an excuse for any lack of success; all of this despite the fact that they continue to reside in the land of their former slavemasters and must continually battle for basic human rights (or even to be left alone to live and work in peace) even in 2018.

If African Americans even discuss (much less make a movie about) the Transatlantic Slave Trade or any of the vestiges of racism, they are shunned.  They are attacked by all sides, even some of their own who think only of their own finances and not the fate of their people.  And on that note, to date, this is the only group that has received no monetary reparations for either their suffering or, in many cases, their contributions to the American economy, history or society.  Never mind that other races of people have received monetary reparations and apologies for race-related misdeeds, if they argue for it, they are just lazy and want something for nothing.

Today, in the face of continued racism, African Americans are supposed to and expected to abandon their own fight for justice to champion the battle that Mexicans and other people of color are experiencing against the same regime that destroyed and oppressed them…in spite of the fact that many of these other people have been, for the most part, silent for the plight of black people.

African Americans are expected to do this even though these same groups of people did nothing to assist them at the height of their mistreatment and, even worse, spoke out against their attempts to redress the balance and pursue justice.

It must be asked: where was the outrage for black people being murdered in the streets, and thus separated from their families by a bit more than a cell wall?  Where was the understanding that the system was flawed and actively working against a group of people to protect the interests of white supremacy?  And where were the unity, calls to action and cries for accountability just a few months ago, when white America was openly complaining that their rights were infringed upon because black people finally understood that their lives mattered?

Do the people who have been calling for assistance and compassion this entire time look like the bad guys in this scenario?  Does it make other peoples of color who are experiencing race related mistreatment the bad guys?  God forbid.  Instead, it should shine an ugly, historical light on the peoples—the same peoples—who are once again destroying the lives of yet another group of people (and people of color I might add).

Can anybody hear me?

As depressing as it is to say, racism/white supremacy is just as rampant today as it has ever been at any time in history.  Granted, it’s not as overt or as outright and widespread as enslavement, but it’s present nonetheless.  More than that, it’s no longer hiding under the veil of civility.

This may not seem like a profound revelation to some but for those who have had to endure this malady from the cradle, while often pretending that they don’t, it’s groundbreaking.

It’s groundbreaking not because it’s so shocking or somehow strange to modern day sensibilities.  Rather, it’s groundbreaking because of the clarity it brings to the everyday existence of the affected parties.

For those above mentioned individuals, the reality that a large portion of white America, as well as a decent sized swath of the rest of the population, considers them to be lesser people answers a lot of the nagging questions they have had about the status of their lives, education, and employment.

For those individuals, it answers the “whys.”  Why are other races of people allowed to prosper?  Why are blacks treated differently from other races?  Why do the cries of black people fall upon deaf ears? Why are black people profiled as criminals regardless of their contributions to society?

Regardless of what is going on in the world or what other races of people are actually committing crimes, somehow, blacks are projected as the race of people that should be feared.

Even though the recent school shooters, church shooters, concert shooters, cinema shooters and mail bombers have all been white males, black males are still seen as the most dangerous threat imaginable.  Somehow, the white males are often presented as loners (not terrorists) and arrested without incident.

Meanwhile, a young father in his grandmother’s backyard with a cell phone was fatally wounded by law enforcement…because the officers suddenly feared for their lives!

The reality of seeing so many people armed to the teeth for fear of black and brown people answers the question of why the police don’t fear for their safety when dealing with white armed males but are afraid of unarmed black males to the point that they are murdered.

It also answers why so many other races of people who see proof of the injustices manage to somehow justify them.

Still, the question must be asked, what’s going on here?

Do white people believe black people are imagining these situations?  Do they see the fight for life as whining?  Complaining about nothing?

Can white people actually justify these situations as fair?  Do they even care?

More importantly, how long can any group think they will get away with these atrocities without repercussions?

Can anybody hear me?